EXCLUSIVE: Artificial intelligence could pose an existential threat to humanity if left unchecked on its current path, leading technology ethicist Tristan Harris said this week.
Harris spoke with Fox News Digital on the sidelines of the Senate's inaugural AI Insight Forum this week. Lawmakers heard from tech giants like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, as well as union leaders Liz Shuler and Randi Weingarten and experts like Harris and others about where they think AI is headed and how to be best prepared for it.
"When Senator Schumer asked everyone, ‘Does the government need to get involved to regulate AI?’ Every single person including all the CEOs, Elon, Zuckerberg etc, raise their hand to say yes," Harris said.
"I think that was an unprecedented and important step forward, not because I'm excited about government regulation, because I'm excited about having a future that's safe. Because if we don't have something that mitigates this race between AI companies, it will end in tragedy."
When asked whether it poses a threat to humanity, he unambiguously said "Yes."
Harris dismissed the argument that AI's future is unpredictable, and that concerns over stifling innovation should stave off regulatory talks.
"We can predict the future, because we know where that race is going, which is, it's not a race to cure cancer and to solve climate change and to invent materials that help us do things, it's a race to just release these new capabilities. Last year, you couldn't take three seconds of someone's voice and then speak in their voice to your bank or to your grandma. Now you can," Harris said.
"Why are we releasing these things? Because as soon as one person releases those capabilities, the other companies also have to release more capabilities. So it's the race to release, which is the race to just drive risks in society.
"And the reason that I'm so confident that the current path — unless something changes — is going to end so badly, is because there's so many risks that come from racing to just release as fast as possible."
The tech expert added that it did make him "hopeful," however, that Wednesday's forum attendees appeared to be so united on the need for regulation — though he said the specific way to go about it had not been discussed in detail.
"I think that what is required is unprecedented for this Congress and for human history," Harris said. "This is an unprecedented technology, which will require an unprecedented response, it's not going to be as simple as passing a law."
He added, "We didn't talk about specific regulatory agencies. Elon, surprisingly, did speak to the fact that . . . 99.99% of the time, he's very happy that the FAA exists. And he's happy that FDA exists, even though the FDA has problems. It's good to live in a world where you have some kind of referee that's trying to govern an otherwise very crazy race with a very dangerous technology."